Contributors

Huge thanks to our contributors

Contributors

The 2026 State of Docs report was produced by Tal Gluck and designed by David Hughes with support from Steve Ashby, Addison Schultz, Suzy Everist, and the rest of the GitBook team. We couldn't have done it without the support we received from the broader documentation community in the form of interviews, suggestions, and feedback.

Ian Alton

Head of Technical Writing | Airbyte

Tina Amirtha-Ingold

Senior Technical Writer | ChannelEngine

Liz Argall

Technical Writer and Consultant | lizargall.github.io

Utsav Banerjee

Senior Manager, Product Docs | New Relic

Daniel Beck

Technical Writer and Developer | ddbeck.com

Jared Bhatti

Senior Staff Technical Writer | Waymo

Sarah Biddle

Manager, Technical Writer | Backbase

Gareth Brinn

Documentation Manager | Gravitee

Dachery Carey

Senior Programmer Writer | MongoDB

Chris Chinchilla

Documentation Team Lead | Supabase

Alison Combes

Freelance Technical Writer

Sarah Deaton

Member of Technical Staff | Anthropic

Gareth Dwyer

Founder | Ritza

Fabrizio Ferri-Benedetti

Principle Technical Writer | Elastic

Christopher Gales

Technical Documentation Leader

Bekah Hawrot Weigel

Developer Experience Consultant | Virtual Coffee

Richard Howard

Senior Technical Writer | parcelLab

Delfina Hoxha

Founder | Little Language Models

Sean Huck

Team Lead, Technical Writing, Platform & Financial Services | Adyen

Lisa Hultman

Vice President, Product Content | ServiceNow

Amarachi Iheanacho

Senior Technical Writer | Sidero Labs

Tom Johnson

Senior Technical Writer, Google

Usha Mandya

Senior Manager, Technical Writing | Docker

Sasha Maximova

Product Marketing Manager | JetBrains

Sandeep Medikonda

Senior Manager, Analytics and Search | ServiceNow

Sarah Moir

Principal Technical Writer | Sigma Computing

Kate Mueller

KnowledgeOwl | The Not-Boring Tech Writer

Shahed Nasser

Head of DX | Medusa

Funke Olasupo

Technical Writer | Rocket.Chat

Diana Payton

HackMamba | Technical Writing Uncensored

Vinay Payyapilly

Director, Documentation | New Relic

Samy Pessé

CTO | GitBook

Doug Purcell

Technical Writer | Supermicro

Abe Raher

Senior Technical Writer | Former Cribl, Cisco, Google

Louis van Roessel

Head of Developer Experience | Adyen

Sarah Sanders

Context Engineer | PostHog

Manny Silva

Head of Docs | Skyflow | Doc Detective

CT Smith

Lead Technical Writer | Payabli

Marco Spinello

Senior Technical Writer | Booking.com

Sara Tandowsky

CEO | GitBook

Larry Ullman

Stellar Docs | First tech writer at Stripe

Hazel Weakly

Engineering Leader in Finance | Nivenly Foundation Fellow

Mirna Wong

Senior Technical Writer | dbt Labs

Aleksandra Zolushkina

Lead Technical Writer | JetBrains

How we used AI

We used AI/LLMs across many stages of writing and producing this report:

Loom and Granola for their AI-assisted interview transcripts.

Claude to help writing Python scripts to assist with data analysis and to generate charts.

Claude Code for synthesizing and identifying broad themes across the interviews, early drafting of the report, and finding some of the highlighted quotes.

GitBook Agent for proofreading and style-checking.

Framer Workshop for small website components, including the animated stat numbers, chart lightboxes, and social sharing.

These tools made writing the report a faster and richer experience with a small team. They also required a lot of human review and intervention to ensure accuracy at every stage of the creative process:

Using AI helped us find some rich and valuable quotes in the transcripts that we might have missed without it.

But it also fabricated some quotes entirely.

These AI tools made the process of analyzing survey data quicker and easier.

But it also made it easier to miss broader context and required careful verification of the data.

In short, our own experience working with AI on this report underscored our findings in the AI and documentation creation section. A report like this consists of a lot of moving parts, and AI made managing them easier. But this couldn't have been written with AI alone.

(This section — like many other parts of the report — was created and edited exclusively by humans.)

Insights

  • “How can we make sure users just get the information they need at the place they are, rather than making them navigate away from the context?”

    Usha Mandya

    Docker

  • “Features do not exist until we write about them and they're released in the product.”

    Sarah Moir

    Sigma Computing

  • “There's no universal docs metric — you have to map your work to whatever metrics your leadership already cares about. That's how you prove value.“

    Manny Silva

    Skyflow | Doc Detective

  • “You need to learn how to advocate for your value. The information architecture, the advocating for the user, the making decisions — with AI, we're more editors, but we're also more information architects.”

    Larry Ullman

    Stellar Docs | First tech writer at Stripe

  • “We need technical writers more than ever because of AI. Right now is the time for companies to double down on documentation.”

    Shahed Nasser

    Medusa

  • “I've had so many conversations with writers around, ‘How do I prove that what I'm doing matters? How can I demonstrate ROI in ways that will feel compelling to my higher-ups?’“

    Kate Mueller

    KnowledgeOwl | The Not-Boring Tech Writer

  • “There's a shift happening where a lot of product companies are lagging. Your users are just telling their agents to build them something, not mentioning your product. If you're not in the agent's frame of reference, you're never going to come up.”

    Dachary Carey

    MongoDB

  • “I don't know how you shop for software, but if I'm looking for a solution, I don't want to look at the marketing site. I want to look at the docs.”

    CT Smith

    Payably

  • “The work of a writer is of course to create documentation. But it is also to resist documentation when the writer sees it's not really a documentation problem — it's a design problem.”

    Utsav Banerjee

    New Relic

  • “At the end of the day, people explain stuff and write stuff for other humans, even though there is this AI layer in between.”

    Aleksandra Zolushkina

    JetBrains

Further reading

Purchase Decisions and Business Impact

Even great documentation fails if no one can find it — and when that happens, users end up turning to support tickets, third-party trainers, or chatbots instead.

Makes the case for tech writers as strategic product contributors — think user activation rates and time-to-first-API-call, not just page quality.

How docs have quietly become the new top-of-funnel — the companies winning right now aren’t just building better products, they’re building the most AI-readable product knowledge on the internet.

Docs Team Structure

Great docs aren’t just well-written — they require real organizational investment, and “just make it like Stripe” glosses over everything that actually makes that possible.

A practical look at how documentation ownership actually gets distributed across PMs, designers, engineers, and legal — and why that matters more than most teams admit.

Three models for how documentation teams can position themselves — useful for thinking through where your team sits and where it might want to go.

Docs and Product

The tension between maintenance work and strategic projects isn’t really a conflict — this episode makes the case that they’re actually symbiotic, which is a useful reframe for small teams deciding what to prioritize.

Completeness, correctness, and discoverability — three problems that have never really been solved. Maps directly to the report’s finding that keeping docs in sync remains the #1 challenge.

Makes the case for integrating docs directly into product design rather than treating them as an afterthought — a natural companion to this section’s themes.

The Product is Docs — Christopher Gales and the Splunk Documentation Team

A collection of essays on what it actually looks like to run a doc team inside a fast-moving product org — written from direct experience, not theory.

Docs for Developers — Jared Bhatti, Sarah Corleissen, Jen Lambourne, David Nuñez, Heidi Waterhouse

The field guide for developer docs, following a fictional product team through the full documentation lifecycle — from understanding users to publishing and measuring impact.

Docs Tooling

Built an AI agent to simulate user navigation with real personas — a clever way to test information architecture that works for both human and AI consumers.

A case for tech writers automating their own repetitive work through scripting and custom CLI tools — built a 20+ command CLI that genuinely transformed their workflow.

Docs-as-code often ends up being just tool adoption without any real process investment — and while engineering teams have whole teams supporting their workflows, docs teams are lucky to get one engineer.

Measuring the Success of Docs

Honest take on why docs metrics are so hard to interpret — argues for getting incrementally less wrong rather than chasing a perfect unified metric.

Doc teams need a different approach to analytics than marketing does — raw data is misleading without behavioral, product, and business context layered in.

Built an AI-powered tool using Claude API and Playwright that simulates user personas navigating docs to spot usability issues — a creative approach to measuring effectiveness when formal user research isn’t an option.

Data on the massive surge in AI-driven traffic to documentation — directly relevant to the finding that page views are becoming unreliable and teams need new metrics.

AI and Documentation Creation

The writing was always the cheap part — Fabrizio Ferri-Benedetti

A useful corrective to the “AI makes docs 10x faster” narrative — the real cost of good documentation was never the writing itself, it was all the thinking that had to happen first.

AI-powered ticket triage is surfacing docs gaps in real time — and as LLMs become primary consumers of documentation, the content itself needs to change too.

AI writes like a copywriter, not a technical writer — here’s what that means for the editing skills that actually matter now.

Creating onboarding docs for a new teammate simultaneously made AI tools work better — turns out style guides and Vale linting are exactly the kind of context engineering that both humans and AI need.

AI and Documentation Consumption

CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, and similar files are documentation — and research shows human-written configs outperform auto-generated ones by 29% on task completion. Worth thinking about as docs expand beyond the docs site.

The missing piece isn't better prompts — it's deliberately engineering what data enters the system's context, when, and for how long.

Covers CLAUDE.md files, llms.txt standards, and AI-friendly doc formats — a good primer on what “writing for AI audiences” actually looks like in practice.

Directly about structuring docs for AI audiences while maintaining human readability — the core tension in this section.

Model training and real-time agent retrieval are two completely different access patterns — and most "AI-friendly docs" guidance only addresses one of them.

Docs and Professional Development

The expensive work now is information architecture, taxonomy, and context curation — writers who lean into automation and tooling will be the ones who thrive.

A framework for working alongside AI rather than being replaced by it — develop domain expertise, automate repetitive tasks, and design docs for machine consumption.

Practical strategies for building visibility and championing docs value — maps nicely to the idea that tech writers need to be louder about what they actually contribute.

Strategies for positioning as a strategic partner rather than a content producer — embracing AI tools while keeping critical thinking front and center.

Want to take part in an interview or help us with research? Get in touch.

The State of Docs Report was initiated and administered by the team at GitBook, with input from expert partners to align on the metrics, processes, tools, and trends facing technical documentation and docs teams

The State of Docs Report was initiated and administered by the team at GitBook, with input from expert partners to align on the metrics, processes, tools, and trends facing technical documentation and docs teams

© 2026 Copyright GitBook INC.
440 N Barranca Ave #7171, Covina, CA 91723, USA. EIN: 320502699

© 2026 Copyright GitBook INC.
440 N Barranca Ave #7171, Covina, CA 91723, USA. EIN: 320502699

© 2026 Copyright GitBook INC.
440 N Barranca Ave #7171, Covina, CA 91723, USA. EIN: 320502699